What if I were to inform you that some of the world’s tallest skyscrapers have a hidden warning sign that signals the economy? It’s something that sounds like it’s straight out of a sci-fi movie, I admit. But there exists a very intriguing theory that suggests exactly that. Whenever human beings reach up to the heavens and construct record-breaking skyscrapers, it seems that a financial downslide follows close on their heels.

Coincidence? Superstition? Or is something more profound at work here?

Let’s deconstruct this strange relationship, analyze why it keeps showing up in history, compare it to other markers of the economy, and look at how today’s trends might be redefining it.

The Curse Behind History: Skyscrapers & Economic Slumps

The idea was first proposed by British economist Andrew Lawrence in 1999. He noticed a strange trend: The tallest buildings seemed to appear right before financial crises hit. It wasn’t long before it was christened the Skyscraper Index—a quirky but strangely compelling economic indicator.

Here are some of the primary cases that have driven this theory:

Singer Building, New York (1908)

Formerly the world’s tallest building, Singer Building was completed in 1908 at the same time that the Panic of 1907 rocked the American economy. It wasn’t at fault, but it was a time of overconfidence on the brink of financial disaster.

New York’s Empire State Building (1931)

Perhaps the most famous example. The Empire State Building opened during the peak of the Great Depression. It was a tribute to human energy at a time that millions were unemployed and businesses were folding up shop. Its grandeur seemed hauntingly out of place against a landscape of economic desperation.

World Trade Center, New York (1973)

The Twin Towers were completed at a time that the U.S. economy was experiencing a difficult stage of stagflation—unpleasant mix of slow growth and high prices. The towers’ optimism was a contrast to rising economic uncertainty.

Burj Khalifa, Dubai (2010)

Welcomed as being the world’s tallest building, completion of Burj Khalifa coincided with the aftermath of the 2008 global financial meltdown. Dubai’s debt and that of the world in general caused many to wonder if another mega-skyscraper had presaged economic doom.

Click here to learn more and subscribe to the newsletter

Why does the Skyscraper Curse occur?

Is there really a causal link between tall buildings and financial crashes? Probably not in some sort of mystical manner—but there do exist good economic explanations to account for the correlation.

The Boom Mindset Trap

Skyscrapers don’t rise up over night—they require deep pockets of capital, optimistic market projections, and long-term belief. They’re initiated by developers in boom times when cash is plentiful and risks seem low.

By that time, however, the economy might already have changed. Too frequently, over-optimism leads to over-investment, bubbles burst and the economy decelerates with those grand buildings serving as reminders of misplaced optimism.

Competitive One-Upmanship

Skyscrapers become symbols of status to cities and nations alike—ways to announce their wealth and power to the world. It turns into a global game of “Who can build tallest.” More and more builders scramble to win that title, stretching resources to their breaking point, piling up debt, and masking weaknesses in the economy.

How Does This Compare to Other Economic Indicators?

Notably, the Skyscraper Index is more of a symbolic indicator rather than a scientific forecaster, similar to other unorthodox economic indicators like:

The Lipstick Index (suggesting that lipstick sales rise during periods of recession)

The Big Mac Index (to compare currency value using burger prices)

Hemline Index (where supposed indicators of skirts length indicate economic conditions)

Unlike interest rates or GDP readings, they don’t yield numbers but reflect attitudes of consumers and investors. In that regard, skyscrapers—tall in boom periods but with cracks evident once the party’s over—serve a similar metaphoric function. Are skyscrapers still relevant today? The COVID-19 pandemic and the rise of remote work might have shifted the dynamics entirely. Suddenly, corporations worldwide realized they no longer needed giant office buildings to operate efficiently. 

The work-from-home revolution could change how cities grow, potentially breaking the age-old cycle of overbuilding during economic highs. Indeed, focus may shift away from skyscrapers to digital infrastructure or to investing in artificial intelligence. Will the next economic “curse” revolve around gigantic technology boom and busts rather than physical monuments? 

Get your free guide “Passive Real Estate Investing For Busy Professionals”

Conclusion: Tall Towers, Taller Lessons

Even though the Skyscraper Curse is a humorous coincidence, it gives a keen insight into human overconfidence and ambition and their propensity to become linked with business cycles. Whether or not skyscrapers do or do not lead to slumps, they certainly reflect their time—symbolizing both prosperity’s heights and fractures that follow. As priorities, technology, and work culture evolve economically, skyscrapers can no longer be regarded as economic omens.

In the future, we may be looking at building height no more but at sizes of data centers or at expansion rates in virtual economies to determine where the next financial storm will be. One thing’s for sure: human ambition will always reach for the sky. Whether or not the economy does is a tale still being written.

Share this: