After the 2008 housing bust, the U.S. government launched unprecedented efforts to bail out the economy. Perhaps the most important—and controversial—was bringing Wall Street to the neighborhoods. Institutional investors, backed by federal support and billions of capital, flocked to buy up thousands of foreclosed properties. Their offer was enticing: rescue troubled housing markets, professionalize property management, and afford steady, quality rentals for worthy families.

 

A decade later, investors are making a profit—but residents tell a different story. While residents are struggling against uncooperative landlords, inflated rents, and substandard housing, the question must be asked: what can be done when the most critical concern for the landlord is shareholder return?

 

When Wall Street became the landlord

 

Wall Street Moves In

 

At the foreclosure peak of 2010, entire neighborhoods across the U.S. stood vacant. Institutional investors already had begun buying foreclosed properties when, in 2012, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) launched a REO-to-Rental pilot program, further opening the doors for private investors to purchase foreclosed properties en masse. Giant firms like Blackstone, Cerberus, and Colony Capital moved swiftly, spending an estimated $30-40 billion for over 200,000 properties between 2011 and 2017.

 

These new landlords promised professionalism, property management through technology, and consistent maintenance. They initiated 24/7 maintenance emergency hotlines, online rent portals, and economies of scale that promised to make them more efficient than mom-and-pop landlords.

 

And there was reason to believe this model would work. America was becoming a renters’ nation. During 2007-2017, while homeownership was declining, the ranks of renters grew by 6.5 million households. These corporations filled a void in the market—and for a brief moment, institutional capital and the single-family home appeared to be well-suited.

 

When Wall Street became the landlord

 

 

Click here to learn more and subscribe to the newsletter

 

 

The Reality for Renters

 

For many renters, though, the promises sounded hollow. Families across the country recount a tale of neglect, inefficiency, and buck-passing. One family, who leased a home in the suburbs outside Atlanta from a corporate landlord, endured recurring flooding due to faulty pipes and languished through waits for even basic repairs. Their kids developed mold sensitivities, and loose nails and dust became the norm.

In place of repairs, however, businesses focused on cutting back on spending. Worker testimonies and internal records attest that maintenance staff was overburdened—occasionally only six or seven individuals maintaining thousands. They charged for maintenance visits, charged renters to repair themselves, and required renters to buy insurance for damage to the property.

The consolidation only served to make things worse. By 2017, two major corporations held the majority of the institutional single-family rental market, together controlling about 126,000 properties. With size came leverage, and the companies used it to extract profits through “tenant charge-backs” and charges. Actual cash flows from tenant charges dramatically increased between 2014 and 2018, with financial statements reflecting large increases within this line of revenue.

These practices were more than nuisances—they cost renters thousands. Some were charged for routine wear-and-tear repairs when they moved out. Others received eviction notices for software glitches or one-day-delatory payments, racking up late fees, courthouse fees, and attorneys’ fees that promised to make them homeless.

 

When Wall Street became the landlord

 

The long-term impact on communities

 

Not only have institutional landlords harmed renters, but they have changed the housing market. With ample cash and cheap capital (frequently backed by government-backed institutions like Fannie Mae), corporations have priced middle-Americans out. Investors bought over 5,000 homes in one year alone within cities like Atlanta, fueling increased house prices and decreasing availability for first-home buyers.

 

Even the households that were moving toward homeownership got trapped in a cycle of renting. Years renting, specifically from corporations that never addressed major issues, left few with the cash or credit to obtain a mortgage. Yes, from the outside, their neighborhoods can be picture-perfect, but from the inside, they often have a different story to tell: disrepair, unresolved safety concerns, and residents that feel powerless.

 

The federal government finally stepped back—Fannie Mae stopped its financial support for single-family rental operations in 2018—but the impact continues. Institutional landlords continue to expand, and a few are now building new houses specifically for rentals, and not for resale. The middle class dream of homeowners, one founded on a guaranteed place to call one’s own, is slipping away for millions.

 

When Wall Street became the landlord

 

 

Get your free guide “Passive Real Estate Investing For Busy Professionals”

 

 

Conclusion 

 

What was begun as a harmless intervention to prop up the housing industry has resulted in a new model for real estate—one that prioritizes investor returns over the health and stability of renters. Wall Street’s forays into the renting sector may have helped avert further economic catastrophe through 2010, but its long-term consequences are now undeniable: increased rent, eroding tenant protections, and neighborhoods where families gather to wait for the next repair disaster or eviction notice.

 

One family eventually broke the cycle of renting hell, buying a house after years of struggle. Their story—and that of hundreds like them—raises a fundamental question: are houses financial commodities, or the foundation of family? As institutional landlords entrench themselves further in the housing market, the answer could shape the course of housing in the rest of America.

*This article is based on publicly available sources and is intended for informational purposes only. We do not claim ownership of the content used and encourage readers to refer to the original materials from their respective authors.

 

Interested in multifamily real estate investing? Our experienced team is here to help. From market research to identifying the best opportunities, we guide you through the process. Follow us on Instagram for exclusive content. Explore our comprehensive Udemy course for detailed insights and strategies. Ready to elevate your investment journey? Contact us now to schedule a consultation and achieve your financial goals in real estate.

 

* Disclaimer: The content provided on this website is intended for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or tax advice. We strongly recommend that you consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions. Past performance of investments is not indicative of future results. The information presented here is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or investments. Our firm may have conflicts of interest, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of the content provided. Investing involves risks, and you should carefully consider your financial situation and consult with a financial advisor.

Where to Listen: